Search


News
Articles

News [Show All]

  • .NET (2)
  • Databases (8)
  • Health & Medical (0)
  • IT (98)
  • Linux (102)
  • Microsoft (5)
  • Mobile & Handhelds (10)
  • Open Source (45)
  • PHP (18)
  • Reviews (0)
  • Security (0)
  • XML (2)
  • Articles [Show All]

    Coming Soon

    Subscription

    Email:

    News
    Articles
    Mail Type:


    Office 2007 would cost Massachusetts four times Open Office: Quinn
    April 3, 2006, 6:20 pm
     

    Office 2007 would cost Massachusetts four times Open Office: Quinn

    By Stan Beer
    Thursday, 30 March 2006
    Article Index
    Office 2007 would cost Massachusetts four times Open Office: Quinn

    Page 2
    Page 3

    Page 1 of 3
    Quinn

    Also see Maddog says desktop the final frontier for Linux



    The former CIO of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Peter Quinn, says
    calculations his team did for upgrading office software for 50,000
    desktops showed that Microsoft Office 2007 would cost four times the
    price of an Open Office solution.
    “We did a back of the envelope sketch for implementing Open Documents
    versus Office 12,” Quinn, a Linux and open source advocate, told iTWire
    at LinuxWorld.
    “When you laid it out, we assumed that you had to do about equal
    training because Office 12 is a new product. We attributed no cost in
    terms of installing Microsoft Office or Open Office on the desktop. We
    used a hypothetical number of 50,000 desktops and assumed that we would
    have to replace 20% of our desktops because they were old.
    “We assumed the cost of 50,000 desktops times the cost of Office 12
    which we took as the same price as Office 2003. Then we did a labour
    cost of the time to replace 10,000 desktops, timed at a spread of one to
    two and half hours. When we added all that up, it came to around $8
    million for doing Open Office versus $30 million for doing the new
    Microsoft product.
    “You could argue about my numbers but here’s what I would say to you.
    There’s two very compelling pieces in this where you can decide how big
    that differential is. If you were using Open Office it operates on
    Windows 95 going forward and it operates on Linux. When you go to Office
    12, it doesn’t go back that far, so you knew you were going to be forced
    into some kind of an upgrade. So you have something that you can acquire
    for nothing and spend some training dollars on, or something that you
    have to buy. So whatever way you look at it, if it costs me zero
    acquisition over here and a regular cheque over here, there’s going to
    be a differential. And part of it is that you’re going to be forced into
    a migration of some part of your desktop landscape just because it can’t
    support what is going to be the new offering.”
    And what of the contention made by Alan Yates of Microsoft that Open
    Office is 10 years behind the software company’s Office product?

    --

    Regards
    Vinay

    Mob: 9422113939

    ------------------------------------------------
    Vinay Yadav vinayRas Infotech
    www.vinayras.com Nagpur, India
    ------------------------------------------------
    Linux Consultant & PHP/MySQL Developer
    ------------------------------------------------